Skip to content

Conversation

eshfaq-ux
Copy link
Owner

@eshfaq-ux eshfaq-ux commented Oct 3, 2025

This PR was automatically generated by the AI Test Case Generator.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added end-to-end tests for the Courses page across mobile, tablet, and desktop viewports.
    • Verified responsive navigation behavior and presence of the “Courses” link.
    • Checked header, breadcrumbs, category links (including Web Design and Online Marketing), and popular course cards with images/titles/details.
    • Validated testimonial carousel visibility and footer sections (Quick Link, Contact, Gallery, Newsletter) and copyright.
    • Confirmed back-to-top button is hidden initially and appears after scrolling.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 3, 2025

Walkthrough

Adds a Cypress end-to-end test suite validating the Courses page’s responsive layout and content across mobile, tablet, and desktop viewports, covering navigation behavior, headers/breadcrumbs, category and course grids, testimonial carousel, footer sections, and back-to-top button visibility and scroll behavior.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
E2E Cypress tests
generated.test.js
Introduces a Cypress test suite “Courses Page Responsive Layout” that iterates over three viewports (iphone-6, ipad-2, 1280x720). For each, sets viewport, visits ./source code/courses.html, waits briefly, and asserts responsive navbar behavior, headers/breadcrumbs, category links, popular courses cards, testimonial carousel, footer sections, and back-to-top visibility on scroll.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  autonumber
  participant R as Cypress Runner
  participant B as Browser
  participant P as Courses Page (courses.html)
  participant UI as UI Components

  rect rgba(200,220,255,0.25)
    note over R,B: Per-viewport setup
    R->>B: cy.viewport(device)
    R->>B: cy.visit("./source code/courses.html")
    B->>P: Load resources
    P-->>B: Render DOM
  end

  rect rgba(220,255,220,0.25)
    note over R,UI: Responsive navigation checks
    R->>UI: Assert toggler/menu visibility (mobile/tablet/desktop)
    R->>UI: Verify "Courses" link present
  end

  R->>UI: Assert header and breadcrumbs visible

  rect rgba(255,240,200,0.25)
    note over R,UI: Content grids
    R->>UI: Verify 4 category links (incl. "Web Design", "Online Marketing")
    R->>UI: Verify 3 popular course cards (image, title, details)
  end

  rect rgba(255,220,220,0.25)
    note over R,UI: Testimonial carousel
    R->>UI: Assert header and carousel present
    R->>UI: Ensure at least one original testimonial item visible
  end

  rect rgba(235,235,235,0.6)
    note over R,UI: Footer and scroll
    R->>UI: Check footer headings and copyright
    R->>B: cy.scrollTo("bottom")
    R->>UI: Assert back-to-top becomes visible
  end
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Poem

I hop through viewports, small to wide,
Testing menus that hide then glide.
Cards and crumbs, a carousel spin—
Footer whispers, “Scroll, begin.”
Up we bounce with a button bright—
QA moonlight, ship it right. 🐇✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit's high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title “feat: Add generated test case” accurately denotes that a new, AI-generated test suite has been added, uses a concise conventional-commit style, and clearly relates to the primary change in this PR.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch test-case-1759468490660

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
generated.test.js (5)

18-19: Consider replacing fixed wait with conditional wait.

The fixed 500ms wait for animations can make tests slower and may be insufficient if animations take longer. Consider waiting for a specific element state or using Cypress's built-in retry logic.

Example alternatives:

-        // Allow time for animations to finish
-        cy.wait(500);
+        // Wait for page to be fully loaded
+        cy.get('.navbar').should('be.visible');

Or if specific animations need to settle:

cy.get('.navbar').should('have.class', 'navbar-loaded'); // or similar stable state

33-33: Consider using a more semantic selector for the "Join Now" button.

The selector .btn-primary.py-4.px-lg-5 tightly couples the test to Bootstrap utility classes. If padding or styling changes, the test will break even though functionality is intact.

Consider using a data attribute or text-based selector:

-          cy.get('.btn-primary.py-4.px-lg-5').contains('Join Now').should('be.visible');
+          cy.contains('a.btn', 'Join Now').should('be.visible');

Or add a data attribute to the button in the HTML and use:

cy.get('[data-testid="join-now-btn"]').should('be.visible');

45-45: Hard-coded category count may be brittle.

The assertion should('have.length', 4) will fail if the number of categories changes. If the test aims to validate a specific set of categories, consider checking for the presence of required categories rather than an exact count.

Example:

-        cy.get('.category .row.g-3 a').should('have.length', 4);
+        cy.get('.category .row.g-3 a').should('have.length.at.least', 2);

Or if 4 is a business requirement, keep it but add a comment explaining why.


55-55: Hard-coded course count may be brittle.

The assertion should('have.length', 3) will fail if the number of popular courses changes. Consider whether this is a strict business requirement or if the test should be more flexible.

If the exact count is not critical:

-        cy.get('.course-item').should('have.length', 3);
+        cy.get('.course-item').should('have.length.at.least', 1);

80-84: Consider testing the button's click functionality.

The test validates visibility but doesn't verify that clicking the button scrolls back to the top.

Add a test for the click behavior:

       it('should display the "Back to Top" button after scrolling', () => {
         cy.get('.back-to-top').should('not.be.visible');
         cy.scrollTo('bottom');
         cy.get('.back-to-top').should('be.visible');
+        cy.get('.back-to-top').click();
+        cy.window().its('scrollY').should('equal', 0);
       });
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 16a0273 and 65731c2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • generated.test.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (2.1.2)
generated.test.js

[error] 10-10: Expected a semicolon or an implicit semicolon after a statement, but found none

An explicit or implicit semicolon is expected here...

...Which is required to end this statement

(parse)


[error] 10-10: Expected a semicolon or an implicit semicolon after a statement, but found none

An explicit or implicit semicolon is expected here...

...Which is required to end this statement

(parse)


[error] 10-10: Expected a semicolon or an implicit semicolon after a statement, but found none

An explicit or implicit semicolon is expected here...

...Which is required to end this statement

(parse)

🔇 Additional comments (4)
generated.test.js (4)

3-7: LGTM!

The viewport configuration correctly covers mobile, tablet, and desktop breakpoints using both Cypress presets and custom dimensions.


37-41: LGTM!

The header and breadcrumb assertions are clear and appropriately validate both structure and content.


67-68: Good handling of carousel cloning behavior.

The test correctly accounts for Owl Carousel's item cloning by filtering out .cloned elements. This prevents false positives and demonstrates awareness of the library's DOM manipulation.


71-78: LGTM!

The footer test comprehensively validates all major sections and the copyright notice.

Comment on lines +1 to +2
```javascript
describe('Courses Page Responsive Layout', () => {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

Remove the markdown code fence wrapper.

The file contains markdown triple backticks (javascript` and ), which are not valid JavaScript syntax. Cypress test files must contain only JavaScript code. This will cause the test to fail when executed.

Apply this diff to remove the markdown wrapper:

-```javascript
 describe('Courses Page Responsive Layout', () => {

Also remove the closing backticks at line 88:

 });
-```
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In generated.test.js around lines 1 to 2, the file incorrectly contains markdown
code fence markers (```javascript) and corresponding closing backticks at line
88; remove the opening triple backticks at the top and the closing triple
backticks at line 88 so the file contains only valid JavaScript test code (i.e.,
delete both the leading ```javascript fence and the trailing ``` fence).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant